Love, death and robots. The second season of the cult series

Let's immediately agree that there will be no spoilers in this text, so as not to spoil your impression of watching these short films. The first season of the series “Love, Death and Robots” became an event that is difficult to overestimate, they talked about it excitedly, advised them to quit everything and watch non-stop. Many did just that, postponing everything for later, plunging into the series. Animated films, not connected by a common plot, made in different techniques, a sort of collection of short stories about the future and what it can be. The format is winning, because, unlike the full meter, where if you don’t like the plot, then write is gone, here the probability of winning attention and getting positive ratings is much higher. You didn’t like some films - it doesn’t matter, but you liked others and you will advise this series. In modern cinematography, this popular genre of short stories is well mastered by many directors, for example, one can recall the films “New York, I Love You” and similar films made about different cities and the stories that took place in them.

Estimates of the second season vary greatly - from complete rejection, when a person says that they filmed complete nonsense that does not catch, to restrained enthusiasm - but in terms of intensity they are very different from the assessment of the first season. And here you need to understand the reasons, since they are interesting in themselves. I think it's all about the number of episodes, a year ago we saw 16 short stories, this year there are half as many. The likelihood that you will like one of the 16 works is much higher than that of the current season. Another reason is that the very format of animated films is little known to the general public; the first season of Love, Death and Robots opened up such works for many. And over the past year, a certain amount of watching has appeared, when people have appreciated other similar films and expanded their horizons. But even if this did not happen, the effect of novelty disappeared, the style of the work became familiar. Novelty as a product is of great importance in our world and changes it - a powder with a new formula, but an old name. The same coffee, but now with a richer taste. Whatever absurd things you hear from marketers, but the truth is that for the series, the techniques found quickly wear out, become more familiar. Exactly why the second season does not hit the brain in the same way as the first.

Someone asked me to draw parallels between "Love, Death and Robots" and some other series, asked me what comes to mind first. Without hesitation, he answered that it was Black Mirror. The similarities between these works are enormous, but the main thing is that the trajectory of the Black Mirror and its perception is exactly the same. From indefatigable enthusiasm to a restrained reaction, and the last film in this series went almost unnoticed. I'm bored and I want some kind of novelty.

Here, after all, the question still arises of how much you are subject to other people's influence and fashion trends. In the USSR, many read books not because Dogs & Puppies in Adenta loved this activity, books were the subject of discussion in society, and it was necessary to be able to keep the conversation going. Today, serials have become one of the universal topics, as a result, they need to be watched. And here other people's opinions begin to influence the perception of the series, many say that the second season is worse than the first. What he didn't like. I would venture to express the point of view that the second season differs little from the first, in some ways even better, it has become concentrated. As in the first season, there are films that are not very interesting, and the philosophical concepts set forth in them are not chewed up and require knowledge of other works. They seemed to hang in the air, we need an interpreter who will explain the idea of ​​the authors. For example, the film “Long Grass” becomes such, in which several concepts are generously involved, but the meaning is far from obvious. An intermediate state, when there is a hint of what they wanted to say, but then they remove it in an understandable language and it turns out to be rubbish. They did not please either die-hard intellectuals or the mass audience. Compromise.

Love, death and robots. The second season of the cult series

Let's immediately agree that there will be no spoilers in this text, so as not to spoil your impression of watching these short films. The first season of the series “Love, Death and Robots” became an event that is difficult to overestimate, they talked about it excitedly, advised them to quit everything and watch non-stop. Many did just that, postponing everything for later, plunging into the series. Animated films, not connected by a common plot, made in different techniques, a sort of collection of short stories about the future and what it can be. The format is winning, because, unlike the full meter, where if you don’t like the plot, then write is gone, here the probability of winning attention and getting positive ratings is much higher. You didn’t like some films - it doesn’t matter, but you liked others and you will advise this series. In modern cinematography, this popular genre of short stories is well mastered by many directors, for example, one can recall the films “New York, I Love You” and similar films made about different cities and the stories that took place in them.

Estimates of the second season vary greatly - from complete rejection, when a person says that they filmed complete nonsense that does not catch, to restrained enthusiasm - but in terms of intensity they are very different from the assessment of the first season. And here you need to understand the reasons, since they are interesting in themselves. I think it's all about the number of episodes, a year ago we saw 16 short stories, this year there are half as many. The likelihood that you will like one of the 16 works is much higher than that of the current season. Another reason is that the very format of animated films is little known to the general public; the first season of Love, Death and Robots opened up such works for many. And over the past year, a certain amount of watching has appeared, when people have appreciated other similar films and expanded their horizons. But even if this did not happen, the effect of novelty disappeared, the style of the work became familiar. Novelty as a product is of great importance in our world and changes it - a powder with a new formula, but an old name. The same coffee, but now with a richer taste. Whatever absurd things you hear from marketers, but the truth is that for the series, the techniques found quickly wear out, become more familiar. Exactly why the second season does not hit the brain in the same way as the first.

Someone asked me to draw parallels between "Love, Death and Robots" and some other series, asked me what comes to mind first. Without hesitation, he answered that it was Black Mirror. The similarities between these works are enormous, but the main thing is that the trajectory of the Black Mirror and its perception is exactly the same. From indefatigable enthusiasm to a restrained reaction, and the last film in this series went almost unnoticed. I'm bored and I want some kind of novelty.

Here, after all, the question still arises of how much you are subject to other people's influence and fashion trends. In the USSR, many read books not because Dogs & Puppies in Adenta loved this activity, books were the subject of discussion in society, and it was necessary to be able to keep the conversation going. Today, serials have become one of the universal topics, as a result, they need to be watched. And here other people's opinions begin to influence the perception of the series, many say that the second season is worse than the first. What he didn't like. I would venture to express the point of view that the second season differs little from the first, in some ways even better, it has become concentrated. As in the first season, there are films that are not very interesting, and the philosophical concepts set forth in them are not chewed up and require knowledge of other works. They seemed to hang in the air, we need an interpreter who will explain the idea of ​​the authors. For example, the film “Long Grass” becomes such, in which several concepts are generously involved, but the meaning is far from obvious. An intermediate state, when there is a hint of what they wanted to say, but then they remove it in an understandable language and it turns out to be rubbish. They did not please either die-hard intellectuals or the mass audience. Compromise.

Love, death and robots. The second season of the cult series

Let's immediately agree that there will be no spoilers in this text, so as not to spoil your impression of watching these short films. The first season of the series “Love, Death and Robots” became an event that is difficult to overestimate, they talked about it enthusiastically, advised them to quit everything and watch non-stop. Many did just that, postponing everything for later, plunging into the series. Animated films, not connected by a common plot, made in different techniques, a sort of collection of short stories about the future and what it can be. The format is winning, because, unlike the full meter, where if you don’t like the plot, then write is gone, here the probability of winning attention and getting positive ratings is much higher. You didn’t like some films - it doesn’t matter, but you liked others and you will advise this series. In modern cinema, this popular genre of short stories is well mastered by many directors, for example, one can recall the films “New York, I Love You” and similar films made about different cities and the stories that took place in them.

Estimates of the second season vary greatly - from complete rejection, when a person says that they filmed complete nonsense that does not catch, to restrained enthusiasm - but in terms of intensity they are very different from the assessment of the first season. And here you need to understand the reasons, since they are interesting in themselves. I think it's all about the number of episodes, a year ago we saw 16 short stories, this year there are half as many. The likelihood that you will like one of the 16 works is much higher than that of the current season. Another reason is that the very format of animated films is little known to the general public; the first season of Love, Death and Robots opened up such works for many. And over the past year, a certain amount of watching has appeared, when people have appreciated other similar films and expanded their horizons. But even if this did not happen, the effect of novelty disappeared, the style of the work became familiar. Novelty as a product is of great importance in our world and changes it - a powder with a new formula, but an old name. The same coffee, but now with a richer taste. Whatever absurd things you hear from marketers, but the truth is that for the series, the techniques found quickly wear out, become more familiar. Exactly why the second season does not hit the brain in the same way as the first.

Someone asked me to draw parallels between "Love, Death and Robots" and some other series, asked me what comes to mind first. Without hesitation, he answered that it was Black Mirror. The similarities between these works are enormous, but the main thing is that the trajectory of the Black Mirror and its perception is exactly the same. From indefatigable enthusiasm to a restrained reaction, and the last film in this series went almost unnoticed. I'm bored and I want some kind of novelty.

Here, after all, the question still arises of how much you are subject to other people's influence and fashion trends. In the USSR, many read books not because Dogs & Puppies in Adenta loved this activity, books were the subject of discussion in society, and it was necessary to be able to keep the conversation going. Today, serials have become one of the universal topics, as a result, they need to be watched. And here other people's opinions begin to influence the perception of the series, many say that the second season is worse than the first. What he didn't like. I would venture to express the point of view that the second season differs little from the first, in some ways even better, it has become concentrated. As in the first season, there are films that are not very interesting, and the philosophical concepts set forth in them are not chewed up and require knowledge of other works. They seemed to hang in the air, we need an interpreter who will explain the idea of ​​the authors. For example, the film “Long Grass” becomes such, in which several concepts are generously involved, but the meaning is far from obvious. An intermediate state, when there is a hint of what they wanted to say, but then they remove it in an understandable language and it turns out to be rubbish. They did not please either die-hard intellectuals or the mass audience. Compromise.

Love, death and robots. The second season of the cult series

Let's immediately agree that there will be no spoilers in this text, so as not to spoil your impression of watching these short films. The first season of the series “Love, Death and Robots” became an event that is difficult to overestimate, they talked about it excitedly, advised them to quit everything and watch non-stop. Many did just that, postponing everything for later, plunging into the series. Animated films, not connected by a common plot, made in different techniques, a sort of collection of short stories about the future and what it can be. The format is winning, because, unlike the full meter, where if you don’t like the plot, then write is gone, here the probability of winning attention and getting positive ratings is much higher. You didn’t like some films - it doesn’t matter, but you liked others and you will advise this series. In modern cinematography, this popular genre of short stories is well mastered by many directors, for example, one can recall the films “New York, I Love You” and similar films made about different cities and the stories that took place in them.

Estimates of the second season vary greatly - from complete rejection, when a person says that they filmed complete nonsense that does not catch, to restrained enthusiasm - but in terms of intensity they are very different from the assessment of the first season. And here you need to understand the reasons, since they are interesting in themselves. I think it's all about the number of episodes, a year ago we saw 16 short stories, this year there are half as many. The likelihood that you will like one of the 16 works is much higher than that of the current season. Another reason is that the very format of animated films is little known to the general public; the first season of Love, Death and Robots opened up such works for many. And over the past year, a certain amount of watching has appeared, when people have appreciated other similar films and expanded their horizons. But even if this did not happen, the effect of novelty disappeared, the style of the work became familiar. Novelty as a product is of great importance in our world and changes it - a powder with a new formula, but an old name. The same coffee, but now with a richer taste. Whatever absurd things you hear from marketers, but the truth is that for the series, the techniques found quickly wear out, become more familiar. Exactly why the second season does not hit the brain in the same way as the first.

Someone asked me to draw parallels between "Love, Death and Robots" and some other series, asked me what comes to mind first. Without hesitation, he answered that it was Black Mirror. The similarities between these works are enormous, but the main thing is that the trajectory of the Black Mirror and its perception is exactly the same. From indefatigable enthusiasm to a restrained reaction, and the last film in this series went almost unnoticed. I'm bored and I want some kind of novelty.

Here, after all, the question still arises of how much you are subject to other people's influence and fashion trends. In the USSR, many read books not because Dogs & Puppies in Adenta loved this activity, books were the subject of discussion in society, and one had to be able to keep up the conversation. Today, serials have become one of the universal topics, as a result, they need to be watched. And here other people's opinions begin to influence the perception of the series, many say that the second season is worse than the first. What he didn't like. I would venture to express the point of view that the second season differs little from the first, in some ways even better, it has become concentrated. As in the first season, there are films that are not very interesting, and the philosophical concepts set forth in them are not chewed up and require knowledge of other works. They seemed to hang in the air, we need an interpreter who will explain the idea of ​​the authors. For example, the film “Long Grass” becomes such, in which several concepts are generously involved, but the meaning is far from obvious. An intermediate state, when there is a hint of what they wanted to say, but then they remove it in an understandable language and it turns out to be rubbish. They did not please either die-hard intellectuals or the mass audience. Compromise.

Here, after all, the question still arises of how much you are subject to other people's influence and fashion trends. In the USSR, many read books not because Dogs & Puppies in Adenta Dogs & Puppies in Adenta loved this occupation, books were the subject of discussion in society, and it was necessary to be able to keep up the conversation. Today, serials have become one of the universal topics, as a result, they need to be watched. And here other people's opinions begin to influence the perception of the series, many say that the second season is worse than the first. What he didn't like. I would venture to express the point of view that the second season differs little from the first, in some ways even better, it has become concentrated. As in the first season, there are films that are not very interesting, and the philosophical concepts set forth in them are not chewed up and require knowledge of other works. They seemed to hang in the air, we need an interpreter who will explain the idea of ​​the authors. For example, the film “Long Grass” becomes such, in which several concepts are generously involved, but the meaning is far from obvious. An intermediate state, when there is a hint of what they wanted to say, but then they remove it in an understandable language and it turns out to be rubbish. They did not please either die-hard intellectuals or the mass audience. Compromise.